Short Commentary on Daniel by A.A. Bevan

Anthony Ashley Bevan [1859-1933], A Short Commentary on the Book of Daniel

One cannot avoid the conclusion that the students for whom A.A. Bevan wrote his Short Commentary on the Book of Daniel were fairly advanced, given that they would have been expected to have a familiarity with both Hebrew and Syriac in order to make the best use of it!

This public domain volume comes from the Library of Spurgeon’s College.

Anthony Ashley Bevan [1859-1933], A Short Commentary on the Book of Daniel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1892. Hbk. pp.235. [Click to visit the download page for this title]

Table of Contents

  • General Introduction
    • The text and the oldest Versions
    • Ancient and medieval interpreters
    • Modern interpreters
  • Origin and Purpose of the Book of Daniel
  • Liguistic Character of Daniel
    • The Hebrew of Daniel
    • The Aramaic of Daniel
    • Foreign Words in Daniel
  • The Septuagint Version
  • Commentary
  • Appendix I. — The Palmyrene Dialect
  • Appendex II. — Chronlogical Tables
  • Index of Words and Roots
  • Text, Paraphrase and Additional Notes
  • Index

Book of Daniel and the Qumran Community by F.F. Bruce

The Caves near Khirbet Qumran were the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered
The Caves near Khirbet Qumran were the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered

I came across this hard-to-find article y F.F. Bruce on Daniel and the Dead Sea Scrolls in the Library at Spurgeon’s College. It appears online by permission of F.F. Bruce Copyright International, Inc., Bath, England, and Nashville, Tennessee.

F.F. Bruce, “The Book of Daniel and the Qumran Community,” E.E. Ellis & M. Wilcox, eds., Neotestametica et Semitica. Essays in Honour of Matthew Black. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1969. pp.221-235. [Click here to download the article in PDF]

Daniel in the Critics Den by Sir Robert Anderson

Daniel in the Lions' Den by Briton Rivière (1890)Sir Robert Anderson [1841-1918] was an Assistant Commissioner of the London Metropolitan Police and member of the Open Brethren. In 1885 he wrote this response to F.W. Farrar, then the Dean of Canterbury, who had recently written a commentary on the Book of Daniel in The Expositor’s Bible series. Farrar roundly dismissed the historical claims of that book, so Anderson countered with this defence of a 7th Century dating of Daniel.

This title has been widely republished both in print and on-line, but as I came across a copy at Book Aid I thought it would do not harm to make is available here as well. My thanks to Book Aid for their assistance.

Robert Anderson [1841-1918], Daniel in the Critics’ Den. A Reply to Dean Farrar’s ‘Book of Daniel. Edinburgh & London: William Blackwood & Sons, 1895. Hbk. pp.126. [Click to visit the download page]

Chapter 1

Bv “all people of discernment” the “Higher Criticism” is now held in the greatest repute. And discernment is a quality for which the dullest of men are keen to claim credit. It may safely be assumed that not one person in a score of those who eagerly disclaim belief in the visions of Daniel has ever seriously considered the question. The literature upon the subject is but dull reading at best, and the inquiry demands a combination of qualities which is comparatively rare. A newspaper review of some ponderous treatise, or a frothy discourse by some popular preacher, will satisfy most men. The German literature upon the controversy they know nothing of, and the writings of scholars like Professor Driver of Oxford are by no means to their taste, and probably beyond their capacity. Dean Farrar’s Book of Daniel will therefore supply a much – felt want…

More resources on Daniel can be found here. Of these Alan R. Millard’s recent defence of the book’s historicity is especially helpful.